<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10.2.0.3 patch fails if database word size had ever been changed in the past</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewfraserdba.com/2007/05/02/10203-patch-fails-if-database-word-had-ever-been-changed-in-the-past/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewfraserdba.com/2007/05/02/10203-patch-fails-if-database-word-had-ever-been-changed-in-the-past/</link>
	<description>Oracle DBA (plus SQL Server)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:54:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pythian Group Blog &#187; Log Buffer #43: a Carnival of the Vanities for DBAs</title>
		<link>http://andrewfraserdba.com/2007/05/02/10203-patch-fails-if-database-word-had-ever-been-changed-in-the-past/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Pythian Group Blog &#187; Log Buffer #43: a Carnival of the Vanities for DBAs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 17:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewfraser.wordpress.com/2007/05/02/10203-patch-fails-if-database-word-had-ever-been-changed-in-the-past/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>[...] Fraser reports that Oracle&#8217;s 10.2.0.3 patch fails if database word size had ever been changed in the past: &#8220;If you are upgrading or patching to 10.2.0.3 and the word size is different to the word [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fraser reports that Oracle&#8217;s 10.2.0.3 patch fails if database word size had ever been changed in the past: &#8220;If you are upgrading or patching to 10.2.0.3 and the word size is different to the word [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://andrewfraserdba.com/2007/05/02/10203-patch-fails-if-database-word-had-ever-been-changed-in-the-past/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 10:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewfraser.wordpress.com/2007/05/02/10203-patch-fails-if-database-word-had-ever-been-changed-in-the-past/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Mother of Mercy, good catch.

One would think, Oracle would send out an (screaming) email to all of those who downloaded the patch..shess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mother of Mercy, good catch.</p>
<p>One would think, Oracle would send out an (screaming) email to all of those who downloaded the patch..shess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Seiler</title>
		<link>http://andrewfraserdba.com/2007/05/02/10203-patch-fails-if-database-word-had-ever-been-changed-in-the-past/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Seiler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 21:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewfraser.wordpress.com/2007/05/02/10203-patch-fails-if-database-word-had-ever-been-changed-in-the-past/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Oooh this would have stung me for sure, although I&#039;m not yet sold on patching to 10.2.0.3 (currently on 10.2.0.2).  Thanks for the post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooh this would have stung me for sure, although I&#8217;m not yet sold on patching to 10.2.0.3 (currently on 10.2.0.2).  Thanks for the post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
